Friday, May 25, 2018

A look at the principles of media research; textual analysis, qualitative research and ethics.

I am a thirty-something knowledge management and communications consultant based in Cape Town where much of my work involves the curating, translating and synthesing of knowledge from researchers working in the sustainable development and climate change space. This blog represents an output of my learning from the world of research; an opportunity for me to "walk" in someone else's shoes, in this case my colleagues. I believe greater understanding and insight into the ethics, issues and methodologies of qualitative research will help me better communicate not only the key findings of research, but also the integrity of study. While I do not intend on becoming a researcher, I believe research skills will be necessary to better communicate in my line of work.

Henceforth begins my adventure in research – gaining a skillset in understanding media both internationally and in South Africa and starting here with the principles of media research. In addition, by making use of an online forum such as Blogger, I hope to yield interaction from my fellow media research students, gaining different perspectives and learning together.

Research process and textual analysis:

According to Wagner, Botha and Mentz, the research process should follow seven distinct steps, namely: problem statement, development of the research question, literature review, choice of theoretical approach and methodology, data analysis and interpretation and finally conclusions presented through discussion and presentation (Wagner et al., 2012). Meanwhile, Altheide and Schneider posit there to be four stages: document reading, data collection, data organisation and analysis – each stage affected by the historical-cultural context in which the research takes place. “That is, research methods develop in and are influenced by a social context” (Altheide & Schneider 1996).

Therefore, while conducting even textual analysis – the description and interpretation of recorded or visual messages (Fray, Botan & Kreps, 1999), one must be cognizant of the process and the context in which these were published and how it relates to the current problem statement. Jensen and Jankowski would appear to be in agreement when they posit that “Perhaps the key contribution of the humanities to qualitative research is an emphatic commitment to studying the language of particular texts and genres in their historical setting” (Jensen & Jankowski, 1992). This contextualisation of text will become a clear directing principle in my media research going forward.

Five core principles for media studies research:


1.      Ethical considerations
Ogletree and Kawulich posit that research participants may face harm as a result of a researcher’s failure to follow ethical guidelines (Olgetree & Kawulich, 2012: 62). While they were speaking to a social research context, it is important that the research process not affect participants in any field of study. This includes inconvenience, stress, humiliation or retribution.  

2.      Credibility
A common concept when putting something forward for public consideration, but one that is no less important in research is that of credibility. Being credible means using multiple sources and being aware of bias and historical contexts, but it is also determined by the participants’ input. According to Madeleine Leininger in Critical Issues in Qualitative Research Methods, credibility refers to the truth as defined by those being studied and interpreted through evidence.  Without consensual input from participants and without considering other research in the field, one’s own research would lack credibility.

3.      Consent
This leads me to a third point. Credibility and ethical practices are only achieved if consent is given by participants. According to Zena O’Leary, imformed consent implies that participants are competent, volunteers and are aware of the right to discontinue. Importantly, researches must be not deceive, coerce or induce inappropriately participants (O’Leary, 2005:53). Clearly consenting participation in one’s research will contribute to the credibility of the findings.

4.      Gatekeeping
Ogletree and Kawulich define gatekeepers as those that allow researchers access to participants – be they in organisations or communities (2012: 64). While this may be a matter of procedure or respect, often – especially in social research – this is a matter of culture, in which case the gatekeeper could act as an interpreter of culture helping the researcher understand the appropriateness of their actions. “It is essential that the relationship between the researcher and the community be founded on mutual respect, trust and rapport, and it begins with the process of gaining entry into the community” (2012:65).

5.      Context
Related to credibility and gatekeeping is the act of doing one’s research before doing research to answer the problem statement. Establishing a baseline from whence to work from will help direct the study. A thorough literature review is important as well as understanding the context in which the study will take place – this could be understanding history, culture and contemporary or current influences. “Data collection in qualitative research involves a variety of techniques: in-depth interviewing, document analysis, and unstructured observations” (Jensen & Jankowski, 1992:59). Together, these acts will contribute to credibility.


Sources consulted:


Altheide, D., Schneider, C. (1996). Qualitative media analysis. 1st ed. Thousand Oaks [u.a.]: Sage.    

Frey, L., Botan, C., & Kreps, G. (1999). nvestigating communication: An introduction to research methods. (2nd ed.) Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Jensen, K. and Jankowski, N. (1992). A Handbook of qualitative methodologies for mass communication research. 1st ed. Abingdon: Taylor & Francis Ltd.           

Morse, J. (1999). Critical issues in qualitative research methods. 1st ed. Thousand Oaks, Calif. [u.a.]: Sage Publ.

O'Leary, Z. (2005). The essential guide to doing research. 1st ed. New Delhi: Vistaar Publications.

Wagner, C., Kawulich, B., Garner, M. and Botha, A. (2012). Doing social research A global context. 1st ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.




Sources suitable for developing qualitative research

Doing Social Research: A Global Context
ISBN: 9780077126407
Author: Wagner.C, Kawulich.B, Garner.M

This handbook was written specifically for students and teachers in Southern Africa, taking the reader from the basics of understanding social research, through the process of developing a research topic, understanding methodologies and analysing the data. It has helpful chapter summaries, example boxes and usual links for further reading online. This can be used as a tool by teachers or as a guide for the novice researcher wanting guidance while conducting a research project.

This is a useful addition to the arsenal of the novice researcher. The book has been well thought-out, following the process a researcher should take in their thinking. Usefully, its layout is such that one can easily pick it up during one’s research and find information on the step they’re working on. It is also an easy read, presented without convoluted language, but rather illustrated with contemporary examples – particularly useful for the South African student who would recognise many of the scenarios.

The book has clearly been the result of a great deal of planning, thinking, research and input from young researchers as it answers many of the demands someone – like me – would have. The balance between examples, theory and additional online resources allows the reader to come to a well-rounded understanding of how to conduct a research project. This has already been used multiple times in my short research stint.

Qualitative Media Analysis
ISBN: 9781452230054
Author: Altheide. D, Schneider. C               

Considerate of the student, this book shows the reader the importance of resourcing beyond traditional academic publications and posits the importance of primary documents when it comes to researching the media and social media. It provides useful analysis of the various forms of media and how these might be used in research.

This book covers an array of media and stimulates interest in doing further research – specifically as there are so many new platforms and influences; these are not always defined and it is on the reader’s onus to uncover them in real life. There are also practical examples and templates of how one might design research protocol – particularly useful in comparative analysis.

The content covered in this publication is vast and it acts as a compendium to other research publications. I do not believe this can be used in isolation, but is useful while interpreting media and planning how data might fit into one’s study.

Social Research Methods
ISBN: 9780199689453
Author: Bryman, A.

Unlike some of the other sources listed here, this book covers both qualitative and quantitative research methods making it particularly useful for understanding mixed-methods of research useful for social research and applying to the diversity of the media landscape. The book introduces research designs and theory before walking the reader through literature reviews, planning and conducting research with useful checklists and chapter summaries. The book is divided into four parts: qualitative, quantitative, mixed methods and an introductory section to the research process.

This is a very large and very detailed book, and yet the some 700 pages are not intimidating. It is easily consumable and, thanks to its structure, is easy to navigate. I found the pull-out boxes of key concepts particularly helpful and the “student experiences” an interesting and appropriate addition for a student-centred book.

Written by a British author, this encyclopedic book has a different feel to some of its American (and South African!) counterparts. Alan Bryman has also had a distinguished academic career, being published in multiple journals and books. But it is the thoughtfulness in the book’s pitching that gives this great credibility. It would appear that Bryman took his own advice and worked closely with post-graduate students in understanding their needs. Coupled with range of sources cited, this is a “one-stop-shop” for understanding research.


Management of Electronic and Digital Media
ISBN-13: 978-1111344375
Author: Albarran, B.

This is a go-to publication for understanding the contemporary digital media landscape, along with how it is structured, managed and executed. Usefully, the book includes case studies to show how media structures and historical decisions have influenced the output we encounter daily. From theories to ethics, management and financial drivers, the book takes into account the major factors that have shaped the industry and how these are interrelated.

Written for both the teacher and the student, this is thoughtfully layed out with definitions, examples and multiple tables. The book is dense, but not difficult to get through, instead it is thorough and poses as a useful reference book for those researching media easy-to-follow subheadings and text that is succinct. It is, however, very American focused which in part is a result of the fact that American media holds great influence over global media and the fact that Albarran is American.

Indeed, he is a highly acclaimed author, having won multiple awards and having presented around the world. A professor in the Department of Media Arts at the University of North Texas, Denton, he is a self-described teacher, researcher and consultant. This coupled with the number of editions the book has had – owing not only to its popularity, but also the speed at which the digital media landscape is changing, suggests this has been a useful publication for many.

15 Steps to Good Research
Adapted from the Association of Colleges and Research Libraries "Objectives for Information Literacy Instruction"

This one-page, 15 point webpage from Georgetown University can be used as a checklist while conducting one’s research. Its value, however, is in the additional links it provides to other internationally renowned universities. It is not academic in nature, but will assist a researcher in presenting their research to an academic community.

From learning how to write a thesis statement to evaluating Internet sources and addressing copyright basics and plagiarism, this webpage serves as a tool for ensuring the production of a research paper with integrity – as supported by six other universities.

It is for this reason that I would feel comfortable making use of this as a checklist or toolkit. The range of universities cited gives the reader confidence and offers the webpage some integrity. While this is not a research document or academic publication, it will be revisited in guiding my research paper in the hope that I will produce something worthy of any international learning institution.



Sources consulted


Library.georgetown.edu. (2017). 15 Steps to Good Research | Georgetown University Library. [online] Available at: http://www.library.georgetown.edu/tutorials/research-guides/15-steps [Accessed 25 May 2017].

Albarran, A. (2017). Management of electronic and digital media. 6th ed. Boston: Cengage Learning              
Altheide, D. (1996). Qualitative media analysis. 1st ed. Thousand Oaks [u.a.]: Sage.

Bryman, A. (2012). Social research methods. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Wagner, C., Kawulich, B., Garner, M. and Botha, A. (2012). Doing social research. 1st ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.


A look at the principles of media research; textual analysis, qualitative research and ethics.

I am a thirty-something knowledge management and communications consultant based in Cape Town where much of my work involves the curating, ...